Tuesday, May 19, 2009

DADT: DOES ANYONE REALLY THINK OBAMA FAVORS EQUAL RIGHTS?

On January 14, 2009, the following was reported:

President-elect Barack Obama will allow gays to serve openly in the military by overturning the controversial "don't ask, don't tell" policy that marred President Clinton's first days in office, according to incoming White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs.

The startling pronouncement, which could re-open a dormant battle in the culture wars and distract from other elements of Obama's agenda, came during a Gibbs exchange with members of the public who sent in questions that were answered on YouTube.

"Thadeus of Lansing, Mich., asks, 'Is the new administration going to get rid of the "don't ask, don't tell policy?'" said Gibbs, looking into the camera. "Thadeus, you don't hear a politician give a one-word answer much. But it's, 'Yes.'"


[For the full article, see here.]

Now, fast forward to the present and notice how Robert Gibbs responds to a question concerning the repeal of DADT. See how he is dancing as fast as he can, hemming and hawing his way toward trying to answer a very straightforward question regarding DADT.

Also notice how Gibbs, representing the Obama Administration, is now talking about "changing" DADT and is not using the word "repeal" in reference to DADT; uses as justification for "changing" the policy our "national interests" rather than equal rights for all military personnel.



We are to make no mistake! Obama could obliterate DADT with the snap of his fingers!

My guess is that Obama doesn't see any political mileage he can derive by removing DADT, particularly since LGBT people make up a relatively small percentage of the electorate; Obama seeks compromise with as many factions in Congress as is possible in order to ruffle as few feathers as possible; he figures that LGBT people will not vote for a McCain-type for President in any case; he feels that most Gay people will likely settle for some crumb of "change" in that policy (and crumbs of incrementalism in any LGBT-related policy) when he gets around to it; he cares far less for the lives and careers of dedicated military personnel and for our national security than he does about not alienating potential voters in his Presidential run in 2012, and in his future ability to pass legislation that is far more important to him than is the repeal of DADT.
Share |

5 comments:

DON CHARLES aka "STUFFED ANIMAL" said...

An enterprising Republican could really drive a wedge with this issue, if he were willing to take the chance. There's not even a hint of Scriptural support for excluding Gay men and Lesbians from military service! All a GOP candidate need do is dare to point that fact out and suddenly, he's got an issue that can potentially draw moderately conservative voters away from the Democrats. Hard-headed opposition to LGBT military service is getting harder to find every day. I think our "Change" president needs to change himself! He'd better get over his own Sam Nunn-era homophobia and get hip to the direction the country is moving in.

Jerry Maneker said...

Great points, Don Charles. Thanks, Jerry.

genevieve said...

I agree too, Don Charles.

Buffy said...

My wife and I knew long ago that Obama was no friend to LGBT people and that the few crumbs he tossed our way were just to get votes and campaign cash out of us. We were lambasted by his ardent supporters and saw many of our own succumb to his wiles. He's now proving our suspicions true, and we're eternally grateful we voted for Cynthia McKinney. She had no chance of winning but at least we could rest assured we weren't voting for someone we'd eventually feel guilty or ashamed over.

Jerry Maneker said...

Thanks Buffy. I wish I had voted the way you did! Best wishes, Jerry.